Strategic Planning in a Soft Economy.
The McClatchy Company today reported it is letting go around 1,400 of its newspaper employees. This, after having let go 2,000 others over the last 18 months. Samuel Zell has his spreadsheet and sickle out at the Tribune Company and who knows what will becomes of Newsday as the Dolans take control. Is there less news to be reported? Is there less advertising to pay the bills? Or is it the Internet?
It’s a perfect storm of all three, actually. There is not less news, but more. Technology has enabled few things in the world to go unnoticed. Add to that the millions of bloggers reporting and analyzing news and events and the choices become even greater. Bloggers are competing with favorite newspaper columnists for Share of Day (SOD.) That’s the impact of the Internet. And in this recession-like clime, ad pages are harder to come by.
Newspapers will always be around. The delivery medium will change, but the news will be there. As for reporters, there are good and bad and regardless of where they publish, smart media properties will hire the good to attract readers. With the right packaging and the right mix of advertising, the strong will reemerge and all will be fine.
There’s a saying I once put into a new business Powerpoint deck that actually sounded like a saying: “Campaigns come and go, but a powerful branding idea is indelible.” To me this touches upon the problem with Anheuser Busch’s advertising over the last 15 years — no powerful branding idea. The Wall Street Journal today (6/13/08) reminds us of some so-called great Bud and Bud Light ad campaigns: Clydedales, Louie the Lizard, Spuds MacKenzie, “whassup,” Bud Bowl, Cedric the Entertainer and, more recently, “dude.” Beyond the creative hook, can anyone tell me what the branding idea is in these campaigns? I sure can’t. Therefore, the idea is the creative not the product, and that’s always a bad idea.
No wonder InBev – the company attempting a hostile takeover of AB — feels there is fat to be cut away from Anheuser Busch. They are right. Whoever owns the company should cut the Super Bowl budget in half and spend the $13 million saved on some special beechwood aging gizmo that proves superior taste claim. It will give all the dogs and horses and geckos something substantive to talk about.